Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Barry Siff's avatar

Easy answer, maybe correct, would be all three; however, having been "toward" the top of a $7B, 20,000+ employee corporation many moons ago (as Sr. VP), I think it's a stretch, a "sounds good" answer. It was to set up a 30-minute call of mutual benefit. I can't see this being mutually beneficial for someone out of Mark's area, nor impactful for either ... just a nice political gesture. Yes, I swear I am "enlightened," but I am also a realist. I also subscribe to the notion if everyone agrees on something, it has properly been discussed. Thx Jeff. Good stuff, your conversations.

Expand full comment
Bill Ewing's avatar

I'd say the CEO and the President for sure. Effective leaders need to be in touch with employees who are in their chain of command at any level to get the pulse of the company. The Chief Strategist is a reach for Mark since there is no direct connection, but... if the CSO is a team player and follows leadership directives, he will respond as well. Mark should feel very fortunate if all three respond.

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts